Shapley Value (2-player)
Fair share of the total from a player's marginal contributions.
Formula
Variables
Example
Splits joint gains by each player's average contribution.
How it works
The 2-player Shapley value assigns each player the average of their marginal contribution across the two possible orders in which the players can join a coalition. For player i, that means averaging what they are worth alone, v(i), and what they add when joining the other player, v(N) - v(j). This works because it fairly splits the total surplus while respecting symmetry, so neither player is favored just because of the order in which contributions are counted.
When to use it
Use this when two agents, firms, or partners jointly create value and you want a principled way to divide the total payoff based on contribution rather than bargaining power. It appears in cooperative game theory, profit-sharing, cost allocation, and any two-player setting where the value of alone vs together can be measured.
Worked example, step by step
Two consultants, A and B, can earn revenue from projects alone or together. Let v(A) = 30, v(B) = 50, and v(AB) = 100. For A, the Shapley value is φ_A = 1/2 [v(A) + (v(AB) - v(B))] = 1/2 [30 + (100 - 50)] = 1/2 [30 + 50] = 1/2 × 80 = 40. For B, the Shapley value is φ_B = 1/2 [v(B) + (v(AB) - v(A))] = 1/2 [50 + (100 - 30)] = 1/2 [50 + 70] = 1/2 × 120 = 60. Check: 40 + 60 = 100, so the full coalition value is fully and fairly allocated.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Using the grand coalition value twice instead of averaging each player's standalone and join-in contribution
- Subtracting the wrong player's solo value when computing the marginal contribution term
- Forgetting that the two-player Shapley values should add up exactly to v(N)
Did You Know?
The Shapley value, another Nobel-winning idea, is now used to explain individual feature impact in machine learning.
Share this formula
More in Game Theory & Decision
View allExpected Value
BasicProbability-weighted average outcome of a decision.
Kelly Criterion
AdvancedOptimal fraction of bankroll to bet for long-run growth.
Expected Utility
AdvancedWeighted average of the utility of outcomes, not just their cash value.
Payoff Comparison
IntermediateOne strategy dominates another if its payoff is always higher.
Minimax Value
AdvancedBest worst-case payoff a player can guarantee.
Mixed Strategy (Indifference)
AdvancedProbability that makes an opponent indifferent between their options.